Who is John Galt?

Published: September 10th, 2009

Does Midas Mulligan still live in Russell Gulch?

Atlas Shrugged was possibly the most popular novel among college kids in the 1950′s, maybe as popular as On the Road. The book still sells over half a million copies each year. When I saw a young man reading Ayn Rand’s tome in our local coffee shop recently, I couldn’t help asking, “So, who is John Galt?” He chuckled and said, “I’ve seen the bumper sticker.” The bumper sticker refers to Ayn Rand’s novels and to the cultists who follow her philosophy of “reasoned selfishness.” The young reader in the coffee shop is not sure he follows Ayn’s philosophy, but he asked me the questions so many folks ask. “Which gulch in Colorado did Ayn Rand have in mind? Where in Colorado did she center the retreat for her “master’s of the universe?” Did that gulch really exist? Does it still exist? Some Ayn Rand cultists do think such a place exists.

The Philosophy of Reasoned Selfishness

Atlas Shrugged is a long and complex story about the “good” of unbridled and unregulated capitalism versus the “bad” of socialism and government regulation. Her novel centers around a special Colorado valley, a wide gulch. There a few like-minded capitalists gather around the mysterious inventor John Galt. They are living in this Colorado gulch as they wait for the U.S. to implode. Over the course of 1,000 pages Atlas Shrugged makes the same point over and over again. Only the smart people who are looking out for “number one” can create a great society. Selfishness is the best virtue and the only one which can save the country. In that valley, in their perfect free market environment, all balances out for the best.

Ayn Rand was a beautiful and brainy Russian refugee who hated government and gathered a group of admirers about her for years to discuss her philosophy. She divided the world into the “masters of the universe” and the bad people like Wesley Mouch. Mouch, in her novel, was typical of those who lead the mindless masses. They spend and spend and regulate and regulate until the nation is brought to its’ knees. Like in her famous novel, there was only one woman in the center of her believer’s group, Ayn herself.

Up there in that gulch, the lovely and tough Dagny Taggart ruled. Perhaps Ayn thought of herself like her fictional Dagny Taggart. Dagny was the dedicated railroad heiress who brings together the last few souls not corrupted by socialism. All of the “masters” lust after Dagny, but you’ll have to read the novel to see who gets her. Her fictional little group includes men like the composer Richard Halley, the steel maker Hank Reardon, the miner Francisco d’Anconia, and the indispensable Midas Mulligan. Midas, the gold miner, is one of these “last producers of wealth” who are finally revealed to be the “masters.” Ayn seems not to have noticed that the biggest scientific discoveries of the last century have been made at research institutions. Co-operative research, most of it government funded, has lead to the big scientific prizes. The lone inventors she so cherishes exist, but are really rare. I suppose she’d argue that only the rare “master,” who hates government as much as she, makes the big finds the other socialists take credit for.

Was John Galt a Zeke?

The valley in Ayn’s novel functions because of it’s energy production. Since John Galt invented his energy-producing machine, there’s been no worry about energy, though everyone has to work at food production up around 9,000 feet. If only the socialists had let Galt produce his energy-making machine, he’d have saved the world. But, instead they wanted to place taxes on him. So, he retreated to the gulch where energy “too cheap to meter” is pumped out. Naturally the reader thinks of the 1950s when nuclear power was predicted to supply us all with energy too cheap to measure. But, the bad government (in the mind of Rand’s followers) kept it off the market.

The Russell Gulch hypothesis does sort of dovetail here. We certainly did have several visionary inventors around the state who were working with nuclear power. At least one of them did reportedly live in Russell Gulch. Another inventor, the famous Nikola Tesla, was sure he could eventually suck energy from the clouds. We did have (maybe still have) some Midas Mulligan types pulling out gold up in Russell Gulch and secreting it way. So, conceivably Russell Gulch was the model for Ayn’s hideaway for the productive “masters.”

Back To The Real World

Ayn Rand was, after all, a novelist. We’ll never find which Colorado Gulch housed her “masters” and Midas Mulligan didn’t really own it. But, here in the real world we do have those who follow Ayn Rand’s cult. Plenty of folks around these hills will tell you that if the big bad government didn’t get in the way, our capitalists would create all sorts of things and prosperity would be all around us. Some even would argue that John Galt’s process for getting oil out of oil shale quickly and easily is no dream at all. In true Ayn Rand style, they argue that it’s only a few “enviros” and “pinkos” who keep us from the riches tied up in those rocks. Ayn’s doctrine of reasoned selfishness is attractive to many, but I don’t see it working.

I recently read an article profiling top bankers and leaders of the finance world. This article was in the New York Times and was reprinted in part here in the state. Turns out a great many big Wall Street Banker types not only read Ayn Rand, but like her philosophy. I’m not impressed by what they’ve produced, however. Despite the huge bonus checks they cut for themselves, they still don’t act like very smart “masters” of the world of finance. There are many reasons for our current economic downturn, but wild speculation by top financiers was clearly one major cause. Andrew Hall at Citibank may think he deserves that $100 million bonus Obama is trying to take away. He may even like reading Ayn Rand. But Citibank got $45 billion in a bailout a little over a year ago from the hated government. I’m not impressed with Hall’s mastery or grieving his possibly withheld bonus. None of this is to say that all bankers are bad sorts only looking out for number one. That same article pointed out how many banks which were given TARP loans have repaid them with interest. Some of the top leaders of those banks have forgone bonus checks.

Good Luck Finding John Galt

I tried not to be too preachy with the young man reading Atlas Shrugged, but he did ask me what I thought of the book. He’s hanging around the area for a couple of weeks and I’ll see him in the coffee house. I promised to buy him a copy of The Weekly Register-Call if he’d like to read this article. I hope I wasn’t too much of an old “you know what,” but the Ayn Rand philosophy has never made any sense to me since I first read Atlas Shrugged in about 1959. I’m aware that there are a number of Rand cultists who meet and speculate about which gulch she may have visited and written about, and Russell Gulch is definitely in the running. Maybe I’ll wander that gulch one day soon. The residents there have a reputation for being private, though, and some have guns. In the mean time the question remains: “Who Is John Galt?”

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 10th, 2009 at 7:18 pm and is filed under Column, Community, History. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • Brian Scriber

    Mr. Whitman,

    Thank you for your 1000 word book report on Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand, while you exceeded the word requirement by over two hundred words, I was disappointed that some of them seemed designed to be hurtful and slanted. The use of terms such as “cultists” to describe fellow readers shows bias, please focus instead on an objective review of the material. You also use quotes to describe the free market industrialists of the book as “masters of the universe” and you used the quoted terms “enviros” and “pinkos” implying that all these terms were used by Rand; they were not. This didn’t affect your overall grade, but it was clear you either weren’t familiar with the material or are using secondary sources (Cliffs Notes?).

    I feel it is important for you to understand that Rand did not ignore research institutions, as you state as part of the thesis in your report; research institutions are in fact a pillar of the book. Hugh Akston was the head of the Department of Philosophy at the Patrick Henry University where he taught three of the story’s protagonists; perhaps you missed those chapters. You go on to state that “the indispensable Midas Mulligan” is a gold miner – he was not a gold miner, he was a banker. You wrote of John Galt getting oil out of shale, that was Ellis Wyatt. While I winked at your initial implications, I’m afraid these material oversights did have an impact on your overall book report grade.

    It is clear that you missed the point of the book, it’s not as much about the evils of government as it is about man as an heroic being, about the motive power in our country being the creativity and will of the human mind. Ayn writes about what might happen if the fruits of productive achievement were to be redistributed to those who did not do the work, but it’s not a tragedy as you have implied, it is instead an opus to those ideals that made our country great and which we can choose to guide us in the future. As the sun climbed into Gilpin County this morning, I am reminded that man also rises; that, sir, is the point of the book. I’m sorry your reading was seen as a reflection of negativity, I’m not sure if that’s influenced more by your politics or lack of attention during your reading of the novel. Either way, Forrest, I have graded your book report an F. I hope you find time for a rereading of this contribution to American Literature and I hope you come away from it this time with the triumph and joy that brings happiness to a reasoned and productive mind.

    Brian Scriber

  • Jeff Northrup

    I could count the things I agree with Forrest Whitman about on one hand and still have enough fingers left to shoot a handgun. He mentions one of those things in this ridiculously ignorant article. I’m not going to address his nonsense, anyone who has actually read Atlas Shrugged and understood it would find such a critique obvious and redundant. I’ll just accept that Mr. Whitman believes every word he wrote. For those who have never read Atlas Shrugged, if you start by assuming every opinion Forrest holds about the book is false, you will have an enormously better understanding of the work than he does.

    Before getting to that lonely point of agreement between Forrest and me I will say that I am just as apt to criticize those he refers to as “cultists” (I prefer to call them Randroids) as I am to criticize him…both for the same reason…they missed the point of the story; albeit in different ways. Since this comment isn’t about those who like the book but missed its point, I’ll get back to where I started.

    Based on his attitude toward citizens of Gilpin County as evidenced by his folksy but disdainful treatment of many of them in his regular writing, as well as his well-known political positions and resulting actions in government I absolutely agree that the point of Atlas Shrugged has never made any sense to him. It is quite obvious the notion that if one feels the right and has the power to enforce the right to outright confiscate the fruits of another person’s labor anytime for any purpose that the said fruit producer will simply stop producing is unfathomable to Mr. Whitman. Sadly he is not alone in this. All of Gilpin County’s commissioners and most of the other local and state public officials have no compunction about giving away the shirt from another person’s back in exchange for votes and personal glory.

    Jeff Northrup

  • Cayman

    In my view Nikola Tesla, the inventor of our modern AC electrification system, is the inspiration for John Galt. Tesla is arguably one of the most brilliant and significant figures of our time, and his most audacious undertaking– harnessing the unlimited electrical potential between earth and atmosphere and delivering it wirelessly to the whole world– became his undoing when his principle financial backer, J.P. Morgan, found what he was up to and pulled the plug. Further, Morgan sent the word out that there would be retribution to any financier who dared try to refinance Tesla on his quest to bring free electricity to the world. Tesla ultimately withdrew from prominence, and died penniless, taking his invention to the grave with him. Engineers of his day and today view Tesla both in awe and bewilderment, because his AC power contributions were so stunning, yet his wireless energy ideas so unbelievable they were considered delusional.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/caribbeanzw caribbeanzw

    Read Atlas Shrugged again, old man, and maybe you will remember that Dagny was not the only woman in the gulch, she was just the main character of the book. The bankers that defrauded investors and then held the world at gunpoint saying that if they went out of business the economy would collapse were not in any way living life by the same standards as Ayn Rand lays out in Atlas Shrugged. Keeping money you earned is rational self interest, keeping money you stole is neither rational nor in your self interest. If you want to criticize a book, or a philosophy, then at least get your facts straight.

  • John Galt

    No question Nikola Tesla was the basis for John Galt, because of his vacuum tube electric car alone would qualify him, however, I urge you to study how Edison/Morgan looted him , Westinghouse betrayed him to get the $1/hp royalty agreement freed up, so J.P. did not have to make Tesla the richest man in the world that could fund the “free energy” he captured in his electric motor. Don’t go see the movie, read the book, because the movie is a trick to manipulate folks way from this type of people in the world from being identified, like Bush Jr. as a Mr. Thompson, who the traitor Greenspan really is, the Neo-Con, vs. Neo-Lib false flag disinformation, & similar Propaganda tricks going on through the media! Just generally muddy up the water, so no one can ascertain what, from whom?

Recent Stories

Recent Comments

Social Network